 |
| August 2008
Alliance Action |
1) Vote
in primary election Aug. 19
2) Draft Comp Plan won’t
work, and here’s why
3) Update on moratoriums
4) Town approves master plan for
huge hotel near 5-Way
5) Affordable housing updates
6) Other town and county items
of interest
7) Comment on Bridger-Teton motorized
travel plan by Aug. 4
8) Other public lands news
9) Wolves get reprieve
10) Coming Events
11) Valley Echoes
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • •
1) Vote
in primary election Aug. 19
Those candidates who support a wild and beautiful
Jackson Hole will advance only if you vote for
them in the primary election on Aug. 19. The
Wyoming Conservation Voters Education Fund has
published a guide for Teton County voters that's
available at www.wcvedfund.org.
Articles about the candidates and their values
are also available on the Jackson Hole News&Guide
website at www.jhnewsandguide.com/election.php.
There are several different versions of the primary
ballots, which vary according to party affiliation
and voting districts. All ballots have the five
specific purpose excise tax propositions: $6 million
for a pathway along Hwy. 22 and West Broadway;
$1 million for Jackson sidewalks; $1.5 million
for design costs of a library addition; $2.5 million
for designing START transit and town public works
facilities; and $52.75 million for a new county
jail. Absentee ballots are available at the Teton
County Clerk’s office, 200 S. Willow -- you
can vote there 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays through
Aug. 18, or call (307) 733-7733 and ask to have
a ballot mailed to you. Not registered to vote?
You can register at the polls on Aug. 19.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
2) Draft
Comp Plan won’t work, and here’s
why
The deadline for online comments on the first
draft of the Jackson/Teton County Comprehensive
Plan was July 31, but general comments are still
being accepted throughout the update process,
and we urge you to stay involved. Information
is available at www.jacksontetonplan.com and www.jhalliance.org/issuescompplan.htm.
For a list of people to share your comments with,
please visit www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts/CompPlanContacts.6-08.pdf.
While the Conservation Alliance appreciates
the complexity of the Comp Plan update and the
hard work by planning staff, we have significant
concerns with the plan and process to date. (See www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts/CompPlanComments.7-08/JHCACompPlanComments.7-08.pdf for
our full comments on the draft Comp Plan.)
First, even though the Comp Plan’s framework
and outcomes are entirely based on strong cooperation
and coordination between the town and county,
it’s unclear to what extent this is happening.
Second, we believe the plan must address community
issues much more holistically than it has so
far. The draft plan provides no direction in
the case of conflicting priorities, and undervalues
the role of Jackson Hole as a unique gateway
community with a critical role in the Greater
Yellowstone ecosystem. Recent surveys all showed
that our community holds two common core values
-- protecting wildlife and managing growth responsibly.
But the draft plan fails to provide a way for
these goals to be realized. The draft lacks a
comprehensible and unique foundation for future
planning in Jackson Hole.
Third, the Comp Plan needs to address smart
growth in a much more comprehensive way. The
draft plan does a good job of outlining why a
minimized development footprint is important
for wildlife. But it doesn’t identify or
analyze overall potential for residential and
commercial development (e.g., potential numbers
of additional dwelling units, residents and commercial
square footage), or responsible rates of growth.
From an ecological perspective, the draft plan
appears to be based on inaccurate and incomplete
assumptions. Overall reduced development potential
must be a top priority in the Comp Plan -- both
community input and planning principles support
this approach.
Fourth, the future land-use plan maps need significant
refinement and clarity to determine to what extent
the development footprint will be lessened, and
whether the footprint is configured in a way
that will protect both ecologically valuable
areas and the community’s quality of life.
The maps have caused confusion since it’s
not apparent what they actually propose regarding
specific locations, densities, proportion of
development types and so on. Without clear representation,
the rest of the Comp Plan is undermined. The
maps are supposed to bring predictability to
the plan, so a clear, detailed analysis of what
they propose is essential.
Fifth, it was our understanding that this process
was an “update,” and not a complete
rewrite or revision of our existing Comp Plan.
We hope that significant language from our current
plan will still be included, such as the importance
of the relationship between the built and natural
environments in protecting community character.
Much of our community’s vision and perspective
about what makes Jackson Hole so rare and valued
still holds. We need to make sure we don’t
lose sight of that.
Sixth, the next stage of the update process
must take a much closer look at what sustainability
should mean for Jackson Hole. A key aspect of
sustainability is the recognition of capacity,
limitations and thresholds. How many more people,
cars and buildings can Jackson Hole bear without
permanent damage to the valley’s resources?
To be sustainable, we must be willing to acknowledge
the very real limitations in meeting different
community goals within the context of the community’s
top priorities -- to protect wildlife and to
manage growth responsibly.
A strong, more predictable plan will be based
on asking and answering the tough questions now,
so that our community doesn’t have to keep
dealing with them on a development-by-development
basis in the future. What are the consequences
of drastically increased residential and commercial
development? What does increased development
mean in terms of wildlife protection, workforce
housing, scenic character, quality of life and
fiscal impacts? What does the draft Comp Plan
really propose and what are the potential consequences?
Answers about the next stage of the Comp Plan
process are likely to unfold at the next joint
meeting between the Jackson Town Council and
Teton Board of County Commissioners, Aug. 4,
3 to 5 p.m., County commissioners’ chambers,
200 S. Willow. (UPDATE: At the Aug. 4 meeting,
the electeds decided to schedule a joint workshop
on the Comp Plan for Aug. 25, 3 p.m., same location.
Plan revisions that were expected in mid-August
will now likely be postponed till fall, pending
the outcomes of this workshop.)
We’ll keep you posted.
If you’d like to be kept current more often
than once a month, please write Conservation Alliance
community planning director Kristy Bruner at Kristy@jhalliance.org and
ask to be added to our Comp Plan email list.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
3) Update
on moratoriums
Moratoriums are common planning tools used
by communities in the process of working on their
comprehensive plans. While communities figure
out how to plan for responsible growth, moratoriums
-- pauses in day-to-day permitting decisions
-- provide relief from development pressures
that could otherwise compromise the process.
Four different local moratoriums have recently
been in the news -- two that are in effect and
two that were not approved. Currently, Teton
County has a moratorium on new residential subdivisions
and zone changes on parcels greater than 20 acres,
and the Town of Jackson recently voted for a
90-day extension of a moratorium on condominium
conversions (see #5 below).
The other two moratorium requests didn’t
gain traction with elected officials. On July
1, county commissioners voted unanimously against
a temporary ban on all commercial developments
larger than 3,450 square feet, and on those that
don’t promise to house all of their workers.
This vote followed the planning commission’s
June 9 recommendation to enact the ban as proposed
by planning commissioner Tony Wall. Wall had
argued that commercial development is creating
a need for more employee and affordable housing
than developers are required to build, making
the valley’s housing problems worse. But
county commissioners decided a freeze wasn’t
warranted, counting on a proposal to increase
employee-housing mitigation rates that’s
in the works to help fix shortfalls.
Then on July 14, about six weeks after a Conservation
Alliance request to enact an immediate, temporary
moratorium on all development proposals using
Jackson's planned mixed-use development tool,
the Town Council and Town Planning Commission
held a joint meeting to discuss the request and
possible amendments to the PMD. Unfortunately,
the councilors never made a motion to vote on
the request, but simply acknowledged a need to
modify the tool. We had hoped for a temporary
pause that would have given planning staff time
to: 1) focus on the Comp Plan update, and 2)
evaluate the PMD to determine if or how it can
be modified to better implement community goals.
It’s clear that the PMD tool facilitates
large-scale developments inconsistent with both
the current Comprehensive Plan and the community’s
preferences recently voiced during the Comp Plan
update process. Recent hearings have further
elevated our concerns about redevelopment in
Jackson. (See #4 below.) Officials appear to
be making decisions with little regard for both
the public’s interests and for the precedents
they are setting at a very important time for
Jackson Hole. It appears decisions are being
made without consideration for preserving Jackson’s
unique character, or for the role it plays in
our community’s long-term economic viability
and cultural vibrancy.
On a more positive note, the Town Planning Commission
is tentatively scheduled to discuss possible modifications
to the PMD tool to ensure that it provides more
community benefit on Aug. 20, 4 p.m., Town Hall,
150 E. Pearl.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
4) Town
approves master plan for huge hotel near 5-Way
On July 21, the Jackson Town Council voted
4-1 to approve a 4-story, 154,000-square-foot
luxury condo-hotel complex at the current Painted
Buffalo site. (Councilor Bob Lenz was opposed,
due to the massive scale of the project.) The
applicant used Jackson’s planned mixed-use
development tool, rather than apply as a hotel,
even though the development is nearly 93 percent
lodging. The next step is for Mills Wyoming Hotel
LLC to present a final development plan, which
will also go through review by the Town Planning
Commission and Town Council.
Throughout this approval process, the Conservation
Alliance has questioned the bulk and scale of
the project, particularly given its prominence
at the main gateway to downtown. As mentioned
in #3 above, consideration of PMDs detracts from
the current Comp Plan update process, which is
supposed to take into account the community’s
input about the kinds of development preferred
in the downtown area. In all the recent Comp
Plan surveys (available at the Comp Plan website,
www.jacksontetonplan.com), the majority of the
public has consistently said they don’t
want four-story buildings along major corridors.
The Conservation Alliance is very disappointed
with this vote. Why does the Town Council continue
to endorse the use of the PMD planning tool when
it doesn’t implement the community’s
vision for lodging and commercial development,
or facilitate smart growth?
The decision to approve such a massive structure
in Jackson appeared to be largely influenced by
a desire to compete with Teton Village. In reality,
councilors should be worried about losing what
sets Jackson apart from the Village -- its character
as a rural, small town with lodgings that are affordable
for the millions of people who are drawn to visit
this area each year. Smart growth isn’t about
competing -- it’s about enhancing the attributes
that make you unique.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
5) Affordable
housing updates
RECONSIDERATION OF COUNTY RESIDENTIAL AFFORDABLE
HOUSING “FEE IN-LIEU” INCREASE --
Aug. 5, 9 a.m. County commissioners’ chambers,
200 S. Willow. On May 20, the Teton Board of
County Commissioners voted to increase the affordable
housing “fee in-lieu” for residential
development, as proposed by the Teton County
Housing Authority. However, on June 3, after
hearing complaints from valley real estate agents
and developers about the burden the increased
fees would create, the commissioners decided
to reconsider the fee increases on July 1. This
meeting was then postponed till Aug. 5.
The intent of this amendment, and the other “fee-in-lieu” amendments
below, is for developers to pay fees that are
closer to covering the costs of providing affordable
and/or employee housing (in the event they opt
to not actually build the number of affordable
units required to mitigate for the impacts of
the new development). According to an April planning
staff report on the above amendment, "Projects
using an in-lieu fee are currently paying to
house only about one-tenth of the population
required to be housed by the regulations. As
a result, either the required percentage of people
to be housed in each new development is not met,
or the public subsidizes the remainder of the
developer's obligation."
COUNTY COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEE HOUSING “FEE
IN-LIEU” INCREASE -- Aug. 5, 9 a.m., County
commissioners' chambers, 200 S. Willow. In a
related matter, Teton County commissioners are
also set to discuss an amendment to increase
the in-lieu fee for commercial employee housing
mitigation on Aug. 5. (This discussion was rescheduled
from July 15.) Teton County planning commissioners
unanimously recommended the amendment on June
9.
TOWN EMPLOYEE HOUSING "FEE IN-LIEU" INCREASE
-- On July 21, the Town Council directed staff
to write an ordinance to raise fees in-lieu for
employee housing for projects in town. The present
fee of $42.16 per square foot of employee housing
required hasn't been updated since 1994 and is
not in line with current construction costs.
According to the Teton County Housing Authority,
the fee should be increased to $112.50 per square
foot or $45,000 per unit.
PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF PUD-AH ZONING DISTRICT
-- Teton County Planning Commission, Aug. 25,
6 p.m., County commissioners’ chambers,
200 S. Willow. On June 23, Teton County planning
commissioners postponed until August a decision
on whether to recommend major revisions to the
planned unit development for affordable housing
zoning district. Two recent proposals that sought
to use the PUD-AH (Osprey Creek and Teton Meadows
Ranch) highlighted its inherent problems, and
county commissioner candidate Brian Grubb suggested
changes this past spring. These included amendments
that would require PUD-AH projects to be located
only in specific areas of the county, and to
restrict density to 125 percent of the density
of surrounding neighborhoods and to 150 percent
of the density permitted by right. The current
PUD-AH zone has no limit on density. Planning
commissioners agreed that the PUD-AH needs work,
and they invited Grubb to return with more data
to back up his recommendations, which now include
not allowing such developments on lands zoned
rural.
TOWN CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS AND AFFORDABLE
HOUSING -- Town Council workshop, Aug. 4, 1 to
3 p.m. Town Hall, 150 E. Pearl. (UPDATE: On the
morning of Aug. 4, the Town postponed this workshop
"indefinitely.") A moratorium on condo conversions
in town was set to end July 13, but on July 7,
councilors voted to extend it for another 90
days. At this next workshop, they will discuss
a recent study as a basis for possible policy
revisions regarding conversions.
As real estate prices have shot up, more apartment
building owners are converting rental units to
condos. And converted buildings haven’t
had to meet the same affordable-housing requirements
as new construction, so displaced renters end
up with fewer options for places to live. The
Conservation Alliance promotes diverse strategies
to address affordable housing, including preserving
current inventory and increasing mitigation rates
for residential and commercial development. Policies
that don’t protect existing workforce housing
exacerbate the demand for additional affordable
units. To date, the Town Council continues to
stall discussions on the need for increased affordable
housing mitigation rates. They have only recently
discussed raising fees-in-lieu for employee housing
(see above).
Get informed about the strategies our community
can use to address affordable housing at www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts/AffordableHousing.2-08.pdf.
For more information, contact Kristy Bruner at
(307) 733-9417 or Kristy@jhalliance.org.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
6) Other
town and county items of interest
In addition to the above items, the Conservation
Alliance is monitoring several other town and
county private-lands matters. Here’s a
brief roundup; however, please note that all
meetings are subject to change. Please call Teton
County at (307) 733-8094 or the Town of Jackson
at (307) 734-3993 for confirmation, or contact
Alliance community planning director Kristy Bruner
at Kristy@jhalliance.org or (307)733-9417.
5-WAY INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION -- In July,
the Town of Jackson released updated plans for
the reconstruction of Broadway around its intersection
with Pearl Ave. and Flat Creek Drive. The plans
are available at Town Hall, 150 E. Pearl, and
at www.townofjackson.com (under “In
the News, click on “5-Way Reconstruction
Project). The town is taking feedback from residents
through Aug. 6. Then on Aug. 18, 6 p.m., also
at Town Hall, the Town Council will decide whether
to sign off on the plans; an okay would allow
the Wyoming Department of Transportation to proceed
with final design and construction. Coupled with
the Mills Hotel project (see #4 above), plus
plans in the works to put yet another hotel at
Pearl and Broadway, getting through town could
be quite interesting in the next couple of years.
NORTH CACHE REZONE PROPOSAL UPDATE -- After
the Jackson Planning Commission recommended denying
his request to upzone an area in the 300 block
of North Cache, property owner Dan Cook switched
gears. In a pre-application conference on July
16, he presented Town Council members and planning
commissioners with his ideas for a planned mixed-use
development there instead. Since we question
the approval of PMDs while the community is still
giving input through the Comp Plan update process,
the Conservation Alliance will continue to keep
an eye on this project as it develops.
HOUSING PROPOSED AT “Y” INTERSECTION
-- Jackson Planning Commission, Aug. 20, 6 p.m.,
Town Hall, 150 E. Pearl. On Aug. 20, Town planning
commissioners are tentatively scheduled to hear
a proposal for a 92-unit residential development
close to the northeast corner of the Broadway-Hwy.
22 intersection (where the ready-mix plant is).
WILSON COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT -- Teton Board
of County Commissioners, Aug. 5, 9 a.m., County
commissioners’ chambers, 200 S. Willow.
Commissioners will continue to discuss a proposal
to create a commercial zoning district for Wilson
on Aug. 5. County planners say some of the development
allowed in Wilson’s commercial core under
current zoning could drastically change its character,
while some types of development desired by residents
is prohibited. At this meeting, more discussion
is expected on how commercial use will be restricted
and what percentage of commercial space is appropriate.
For details, visit www.tetonwyo.org/plan and
click on “Link to Wilson Planning Page” in
the Announcements box.
TEXT AMENDMENT REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS
-- Teton Board of County Commissioners, Aug. 5
(UPDATE: This hearing has been postponed until
Aug. 26), 9 a.m., County commissioners' chambers,
200 S. Willow. On June 23, County planning commissioners
voted 2-2 on a proposed text amendment to the land
development regulations that would require the
county to hire the consultants who conduct environmental
assessments on properties. (Developers would still
pay for the required studies.) Currently, developers
hire and pay consultants to do assessments required
for certain developments, such as those within
the Natural Resource Overlay. This amendment would
avert potential conflicts of interest. The Conservation
Alliance strongly supports a change in policy that
would require such consultants to be hired by Teton
County rather than the developer.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
7) Comment
on Bridger-Teton motorized travel plan by Aug.
4
According to the Forest Service, ATV use on
public lands has increased seven-fold in the
past 20 years, and there are no restrictions
on motorized travel on more than 255,000 acres
of the northern part of the Bridger-Teton. This
has led to disturbed wildlife, degraded habitat
and miles of user-created trails.
The complete draft environmental impact statement,
maps and comment forms for a plan to fix these
problems is available at www.fs.fed.us/r4/btnf/projects/travelrevision/index.shtml,
and comments are due by Aug. 4. The plan includes
five alternatives that range from increased road
closures and seasonal restrictions to more miles
of trails for ATVs and motorbikes. (The “No
Action” Alternative A would not be allowed
because National Forests have been mandated
to put travel plans in place on all forest lands.)
Bridger-Teton officials have worked closely with
the public and Wyoming Game and Fish personnel
to draft a plan for a trail system that addresses
degradation of habitat, impacts on wildlife and
user safety. Any of the alternatives B through
E will be an improvement on the existing use
of motorized vehicles in the forest. All of them
include seasonal road closures, and varying compromises
between wildlife and recreation. The government’s
initial preferred alternative is Alternative
D, which would keep many of the trails most popular
with motorized-vehicle users, but would impose
some seasonal limits. The Conservation Alliance
will ask for implementation of Alternative B,
with additional requests for closure of specific
spurs or trails within wilderness study areas.
Our written comments are available at www.jhalliance.org/Library/Alerts/OHVComments.8-08.pdf.
The final EIS is expected this fall, with implementation
in 2009. At that time, any motorized travel off
designated trails will be illegal and subject
to fines. The plan is for the maps to be updated
annually to address changing wildlife or trail
reconstruction issues.
You can make your comments by Aug. 4 to:
David Wilkinson, Public Outreach, BTNF, Jackson
Ranger District
P.O. Box 1689, Jackson, WY 83001;
Or via
email: bridger_teton_travel_ohv_comments@fs.fed.us
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
8) Other
public lands news
BRIDGER-TETON MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION STILL
IN LIMBO -- In early April, the U.S. Forest Service
approved a new planning rule that was supposed
to give Bridger-Teton officials the direction
they needed to formally resume the B-T’s
management plan revision. That process began
in 2005 but has been stalled for more than a
year. (The Bridger-Teton is currently operating
under a plan finalized in 1990 that made 1.9
million acres -- more than half of the entire
forest -- open to new oil and gas leasing.) But
on April 11, a coalition of 14 conservation groups
filed suit in federal court to block the Forest
Service from implementing the new rule, saying
it would remove vital protections for fish, wildlife
and other resources. Since then, the B-T’s
plan revision process has remained in limbo,
but that may soon change. Regional Forester Harv
Forsgren is supposed to decide this fall if Bridger-Teton
officials can do an end run by using the 1982
Planning Rule to make amendments to the current
management plan. Issues in the plan that might
be considered for amendment are the standards
and guidelines, oil and gas development in the
Wyoming Range, and summer motorized travel management
in the southern portion of the forest. Stay tuned
for updates.
PINEDALE ANTICLINE -- The Bureau of Land Management
has released its revised plan for expanded drilling
on the Pinedale Anticline project area southeast
of Jackson Hole. The proposal calls for 4,400
more wells, almost nine times the number currently
in place, likely drilled at a rate of up to 232
wells per year. This would substantially expand
the impacts beyond what was authorized in the
original plan in 2000. Also, in a precedent-setting
move, the operators propose to drill year-round
and no longer be subject to well-established,
seasonal drilling protections for big game and
sage grouse. While this proposal contains some
good measures to limit industry’s footprint,
unless enforceable mitigation measures are strengthened,
this ramped-up drilling in the Pinedale Anticline
will harm northwest Wyoming’s quality of
life, clean water and air, exceptional vistas
and extraordinary wildlife. The BLM won’t
get a second chance to get this important decision
right. They have the tools for a good plan but
so far have failed to combine them into a sensible
conservation alternative. Contact the BLM today
and let them know that a slower pace of development
and stronger enforcements are paramount for finding
real balance on the Anticline. Write to: Caleb
Hiner, Project Manager, Bureau of Land Management,
Pinedale Field Office, P.O. Box 768, Pinedale,
WY 82941. To find out more, please visit
the Upper Green River Valley Coalition’s
website, www.uppergreen.org.
PINEDALE BLM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN -- The
final EIS for this plan should be available on
Aug. 22 at www.blm.gov/rmp/wy/pinedale/documents.html.
(The draft EIS was released in Feb. 2007 and
generated more than 100,000 letters, most of
which cited concerns about energy development.)
The RMP will direct future management of more
than 900,000 acres of federal surface estate
lands, and 1.1 million-plus acres of federal
mineral estate lands in Sublette, Lincoln and
Fremont counties. The plan will establish guidance,
objectives, policies and management actions for
such issues as vegetation, grazing, wildlife
habitat and fisheries, air and water quality,
and energy and minerals development. After it’s
posted, the final EIS will be subject to a 30-day
review and appeal period.
UPDATE ON SNAKE HEADWATERS AND WYOMING RANGE
LEGISLATION -- In July, the Craig Thomas Snake
Headwaters Legacy Act and the Wyoming Range Legacy
Act were included in the Omnibus Public Land
Management Act (S 3213) and introduced on the
U.S. Senate floor. The Senate Energy and Natural
Resources Committee passed each of the 90 conservation
bills in this collection, and committee chair
Sen. Jeff Bingaman introduced the packaged
bill, which may have a better chance of passing
into law as a collection rather than piecemeal.
The full Senate must vote on the Omnibus Act
before it passes to the House of Representatives.
The Craig Thomas Snake Headwaters Legacy Act
would protect 387 miles of the most pristine
rivers and streams in the Snake River drainage
under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The bill
was originally introduced by Sen. Craig Thomas
in May 2007. Sen. John Barrasso took up this
bill and renamed it to honor Sen. Thomas after
his death. The act would permanently protect
the remaining free-flowing rivers and streams
of the Snake River headwaters and secure some
of the best habitat for cutthroat trout in the
lower 48 states. To date, the Clark’s Fork
of the Yellowstone River is the only river in
the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in
Wyoming. Visit www.snakeheadwaters.org for
background.
The Wyoming Range Legacy Act, also initiated by
the late Sen. Thomas and carried on by Sen. Barrasso,
would protect the Wyoming Range of the Bridger-Teton
from further energy leasing, and includes provisions
to allow for buyouts and retirements of existing
energy leases. Sen. Mike Enzi co-sponsored the
bill, which is supported by Gov. Freudenthal and
many others throughout the state. Visit www.wyomingrange.org for
more information on efforts to protect the Wyoming
Range.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
9) Wolves
get reprieve
The Conservation Alliance and several other
groups won a significant victory last month in
our efforts to protect wolves. On July 18, in
a 40-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Donald
Molloy granted our request for an injunction
and reinstated Endangered Species Act protection
for wolves in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho until
our lawsuit challenging delisting works its way
through the courts. In his ruling, Molloy said
the federal government had not met its own standard
for wolf recovery, and that wolf-control laws
in the three states were "more than likely
to eliminate any chance for genetic exchange
to occur." Such exchange is needed to ensure
healthy wolf populations. It’s unknown
if the federal government will appeal this decision,
and no court date has yet been set for the hearing
on the merits of our case. However, the three
states have all postponed their plans to establish
wolf-hunting seasons this fall in the wake of
Molloy’s decision. For
more information about the ruling, see www.jhalliance.org/Library/PressReleases/WolfKillInjunctPR.7-21-08.pdf.
The issue began with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
Feb. 27 announcement that gray wolves
in the Northern Rockies would be removed from the
list of threatened and endangered species. Earthjustice
attorneys representing the Conservation Alliance
and 11 other organizations began legal actions
to block the decision and two appeals were filed
in Federal District Court in Missoula, Mont. The
first was aimed to stop the delisting because Wyoming,
Idaho and Montana’s management plans wouldn’t
sustain the population of Rocky Mountain gray wolves
into the foreseeable future. The second appeal
asked that an injunction be put in place immediately,
thereby returning wolf management to the federal
government until the merits of case itself could
be argued and decided. Background information is
available at www.jhalliance.org/issueswolves.htm.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
10) Coming
Events
The Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance’s
Summer Rendezvous Series continues with the following
events in August. For more information and to
RSVP for any of the following, please call (307)
733-9417 or email info@jhalliance.org.
Visit www.jhalliance.org/contact.htm for
a map to our office at 685 S. Cache St.
Saturday, Aug. 2
Sleeping Indian Day-Trek -- Join Franz Camenzind,
wildlife biologist and executive director of
the Conservation Alliance on a summer hike
up the Sleeping Indian from Flat Creek. Franz
will discuss Bridger-Teton wildlife and public
lands issues. We will depart for the trailhead
at 7 a.m. for this all-day hike. Please bring
raingear, warm layers, sunscreen, water and
lunch. Cost: $15.
Tuesday, Aug. 5
Talk on Coyotes -- As part of the National Elk
Refuge’s
Naturalist Night Series, Conservation Alliance
executive director Franz Camenzind will share
his extensive studies of coyotes at 5:30 p.m.
at the Visitors’ Center,
532 N. Cache. For more information on this free
series, please call (307) 733-9212.
Friday, Aug. 8
Celebration for the
Sage Grouse -- Leslie Still,
the owner of Buffalo Trail Gallery, has come
up with a new way to support the Conservation
Alliance. She is inviting her artists to create
a piece of art related to sage grouse and/or
their habitat. She will donate 10 percent of
proceeds from this special show and will host
a reception from 5 to 8 p.m. on August 8 to
showcase this event at 98 Center St. Please
join us, and tell your friends and neighbors.
Saturday, Aug.9
Wildlife Photography
Safari -- Join professional
photographer and cinematographer Jeff Hogan
on a wildlife expedition to Schwabacher’s
Landing north of Moose in search of unique
photographic opportunities. The group will
bushwhack along a series of beaver ponds in
an attempt to view wildlife. Jeff will discuss
basic photography concepts and skills, so bring
your camera if you have one! We will conclude
the field trip at Dornan’s in Moose with
food and drinks overlooking the majesty of
the Tetons. This is a unique opportunity to
learn from one of the best! Cost: $15 (does
not include food and drinks at Dornan’s).
Saturday, Aug. 16
A Walk on the Wild
Side -- Hike in the beautiful
Palisades Wilderness Study Area. Local backcountry
aficionado Dr. Bruce Hayse will lead a day
hike into the Palisades Mountains to explore
an area deserving of wilderness designation.
Cost: $15.
Wednesday, Aug. 20
Info Lunch: Christianity
and the Environment -- Guest speaker Shirley Craighead,
who started the Ecology Club and heads the Social
Justice Committee at Our Lady of the Mountains
Catholic Church, will facilitate this brown-bag
lunch discussion. Bring your own lunch; we’ll
provide beverages and dessert. Free, at noon
at the Conservation Alliance, 685 South Cache
St.
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • (Back
to top)
11) Valley
Echoes
“He is
a wise man who does not grieve for the things
which he has not,
but rejoices for those which he has.”
-- Epictetus
•
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • •
Alliance Action is a publication of the Jackson
Hole Conservation Alliance. The Jackson Hole
Conservation Alliance is dedicated to responsible
land stewardship in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, to
ensure that human activities are in harmony with
the area’s irreplaceable wildlife, scenic,
and other natural resources. The Alliance is
a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization.
(If you no longer wish to receive this e-newsletter,
please send a note saying you’d like us to
remove your email address from our list to: allianceaction@jhalliance.org.)
|